If possible, turn on debugging in the CF Administrator. Otherwise, you could set a
time stamp at the beginning of the process, a time stamp at the end of the process,
and then do a datediff between the two time stamps to figure out how many milliseconds
it took to process.
If you need specific code, email me directly.
---mark
--------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Warrick
Phone: (714) 547-5386
Efax.com Fax: (801) 730-7289
Personal Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal URL: http://www.warrick.net
Business Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Business URL: http://www.fusioneers.com
ICQ: 346566
--------------------------------------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: paul smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 9:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Faster is Better
>
>
> Good Monday (for part of the world, anyway ;-):
>
> Loading a page with 8 distinct tables (no table
> within a table) with one table with 33 rows
> dynamically generated from a CF Query, I'm
> seeing Netscape4 load the page faster than IE4
> (it seems faster, I didn't actually time it).
>
> Is this a common finding?
>
> How do folks insert time stamps to verify timing?
>
> best, paul
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
> To Unsubscribe visit
> http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf
_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the
body.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebarRsts&bodyRsts/cf_talk or send a message
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
