I suppose it's possible, but... It's all the users at a particular customer's location
and we force our pages to not be cached at all. > -----Original Message----- > From: Will Swain [mailto:will@;hothorse.com] > Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:49 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Mystery: images not arriving at browser > > > Could it be that the users experiencing the problems have > caching turned off > in their browsers? > > Just a thought. > > w > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark A. Kruger - CFG [mailto:mkruger@;cfwebtools.com] > Sent: 08 November 2002 15:38 > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Mystery: images not arriving at browser > > > Check for virtual mappings to image directories. I always miss that. > > -mk > > -----Original Message----- > From: Everett, Al [mailto:AEverett@;askallied.com] > Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:26 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Mystery: images not arriving at browser > > > We recently upgraded almost all of our webservers from > CF4.5.1SP2/NT4.0SP6/IIS4.0 to CF5/Win2K/IIS5.0. Now, > suddenly, some of our > customers are not getting all of the images from the website. > > So, technically this is off-topic. However, it speaks to the > larger issue of > CF Website configuration, so I figure it was okay. > > What is odd is that on the one server we didn't upgrade the > customers have > no trouble getting the images. CF isn't an issues, especially > since we're > running the same code on all servers. IIS is pretty much > configured with the > out-of-the-box defaults. > > Wildcards in this scenario: > > We use Big/IP to cluster the servers. However, the old server > is in the same > cluster as the new ones. The customers are using Novell > Border Manager as a > proxy. Again, though, they are able to get images from the old server. > > So that brings us back to what's different: The OS, the webserver and > ColdFusion. ColdFusion shouldn't be involved at all, since > the HTML that it > creates is rendering just fine. I compared the settings in > IIS between the > old and new and everything is the same (keep-alives are > enabled, server is > optimized for fewer than 100,000 hits per day, etc.) Could it > be something > in the network configuration? What the heck can I look at to > see if it could > be the problem? > > The killer for me is that most other customers aren't having > a problem. For > them, the site is significantly faster with the upgraded servers. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
