Why ask me? I showed the code in my email. It would take only minutes to see for yourself where I am coming from.
Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ 888-408-0900 x901 > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Eugene [mailto:Jebebox@;earthlink.net] > Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 1:18 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Really bad cfc performance? > > > Replacing the CFC with a Java class doesn't yield much of an > > improvement. > > Matt.. are you sure about this? In CFMX writing components in > Java... appears to be very fast compared to the CF Component > implementation...loops ... Math.. Arrays.. data manipulation just crank > up!. > > Joe > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:mliotta@;r337.com] > > Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 4:33 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: Really bad cfc performance? > > > > > > Replacing the CFC with a Java class doesn't yield much of an > > improvement. > > > > Add.java: > > public class Add > > { > > public int add() > > { > > return 1 + 1; > > } > > } > > > > Matt Liotta > > President & CEO > > Montara Software, Inc. > > http://www.montarasoftware.com/ > > 888-408-0900 x901 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: jon hall [mailto:jonhall@;ozline.net] > > > Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 3:58 PM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: Really bad cfc performance? > > > > > > I've been sitting here all day optimizing the hell out of a complex > > > import script and couldn't wring anything more that a few seconds off > > > the time. It ends up the performance issue isn't my code at all, it > > > because I am using cfcs! > > > > > > Check the below code out, I am seeing a significant performance hit > > when > > > looping over a cfc method as opposed to doing basically the same thing > > > inline. The inline code is about 350 times as fast as the cfc! If I > > > take the add function out of the cfc, and put into add.cfm the > > > performance is about the same. That means the performance penalty is > > > coming from the cfc framework entirely. > > > > > > Is this to be expected, or am I off base? If this is expected > > > behavior...it looks like adding looping over cfc's to my personal list > > > of bad practices, or instead of looping, always pass a complex > > datatype > > > like an array to a cfc for processing. That seems very limiting...but > > > it may be the nature of the beast. Anybody know if custom tags behaved > > > similarly in previous versions of CF? I'd test but I'm lazy :) > > > > > > > > > add.cfm > > > ------- > > > <cfsetting showdebugoutput="No"> > > > <cfset objAdd = createObject("component", "add")> > > > > > > <cfset start = getTickCount()> > > > <cfloop from="1" to="5000" index="i"> > > > <cfset rs = objAdd.add()> > > > </cfloop> > > > <cfset end = getTickCount()> > > > > > > <cfset time = end - start> > > > <cfoutput>#time# ms</cfoutput><br> > > > > > > > > > > > > <cfset start = getTickCount()> > > > <cfloop from="1" to="5000" index="i"> > > > <cfset rs = 1 + 1> > > > </cfloop> > > > <cfset end = getTickCount()> > > > > > > <cfset time = end - start> > > > <cfoutput>#time# ms</cfoutput> > > > > > > > > > > > > add.cfc > > > ------- > > > <cfcomponent> > > > <cffunction name="add" returntype="numeric"> > > > <cfreturn 1 + 1> > > > </cffunction> > > > </cfcomponent> > > > > > > -- > > > jon > > > mailto:jonhall@;ozline.net > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
