Sean -
I knew you were going to say that, however, I can not help but feel that that 
execution model is inherently evil, and does nothing to help code reuse.

Personally, I do not see much use for Remoting as a webservice, at least beyond 
fundamental operations.  By building a fascade a CFC is forced to return control to 
the application developer, in my case, revealing far more information and control than 
I would like, and further increasing development time for both ColdFusion and Flash. 
The intent was a black box: the user requests, the CFC figures out how to handle it 
and returns, not vice-versa.  The problem is, in my case, that an outside developer 
could potentially unnecessarily burdening the server with requests to rebuild a query 
because an overly agressive application and would ruin overall performance for 
everyone. Hence, it's something that I need the CFC should control.

That doesn't even go to the fact that code that could be handled in one place is now 
pushed out to every application built around it... so much for reuse.

In short, for Flash Remoting to be more than a 'toy', there needs to be a mechanism 
that keeps the object resident at least for the term of execution.

Mike

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

Reply via email to