Hey Dave; Thanks for the response!
This brings me to want to ask some performance tuning questions, but I feel like I should get the service pack installed first and then come back with some more specific ones. One thing I am curious about is the affect of application variables on memory usage on the server. I can load applications and watch the mem usage counter for cfserver.exe climb in the task manager. Is there a 'ceiling' to memory usage on NT boxes for CF, or maybe just an optimal range? Does anyone have any detailed knowledge about what this figure should be? I suppose the optimal figure would be dependent on processor speed and concurrently running applications, but I would really like to know what admins think about when monitoring this number. I've never really thought about it too much before now, but it may be part of the problems I am running into. M -----Original Message----- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 10:06 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF4.5 C++ Runtime Library error > The "Pure Virtual Function Call" error is a standard > C++ issue. Something has attempted to call a method > on a class for which no implementation exists. My > first suspicion would be a C++ CFX tag... I've seen that error many times in the past, with older versions of CF, typically under load, with no CFXs or anything else beyond a default CF install. Most often, I saw them when teaching the old Allaire "ColdFusion Performance Tuning" class, during the load-testing sections. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
