Mark Smeets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone experienced this when rotating images using this tag? The moment > I rotate an image, the quality is degraded. I checked through the IML readme > file that the tag comes with and after adding the quality command, there's > been no improvement.
Are you having the problem with 16 or 24 bit colour images? If you're using Jukka Manner's original version, it was designed for GIFs and uses an internal 256 bit palette, which is why JPEGs don't look so good. Here's a plug... We wrote an alternative for use on our own projects - cfx_pwimageproc - and we also sell it for US $99 at http://developer.perthweb.com.au. There's a demo you can try to see if the quality suits your purpose. HTH, Kay. Kay Smoljak ---------------- http://kay.smoljak.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
