Hmmmm ... considering I do strict _application_ development targeted specifically for IE in a secured environment where people are not allowed to update anything on their machines, much less see the internet, it is a great solution. The end users are on low end machines and the file MM let's you download to distribute flash through intranets did not work properly behind our firewalls (aka no updating of flash to MX) ... net result was a bunch of blank screens yet again for relying on early generation MM technology, and yet again we had to backpeddle to rewrite the MX solution we were so thrilled with. I have been burned badly by using MX and am looking for non-MM related solutions that apply specifically to IE. All of which is irrelevant to the question which was simply if anyone had ever done it in an application utilizing CF. If I can reduce the traffic on our farm by providing static interfaces that invoke/consume services vs complete page requests I think it becomes an ideal solution for me that has no bearing whatsoever on anyone's intelligence as a developer.
But hey, that's just the where I'm coming from and why I asked the question .. thanks for the input. -----Original Message----- From: Samuel R. Neff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 8:59 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Component Conceptual Conundrum - Continued At 08:39 AM 12/11/2002, you wrote: >(snip) click the buttons ... seems like a great way to build interfaces for >applications w/o requiring flash. Great, they don't need Flash but they need IE on Windows platform. Advantage? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
