Completely agree.. We've had that issue come up many times. Application.cfm isn't the place to do formatting.
| -----Original Message----- | From: Aaron Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 3:09 PM | To: CF-Talk | Subject: Re: application.cfm vs. cfinclude | | | > But if he is already including it at the top of each page, | and this is | > going to continue to be the case, then I do not see any | reason why you | > could not do this. | -- I do... inevitably, you'll come to some point in your | site where you'll want to output only x number of | characters.... or you just want to show an image.. something | that's an exception to the normal rule.. your application.cfm | will then be spitting out DTD's for an image, which will | break this exception page.. | | Those examples might seem far off, but let the | application.cfm just do application logic... use a cfinclude | tag for ANY formatting. I can't see any reason why you would | want to include formatting in application.cfm. | | AJ | | | -- | Aaron Johnson | http://cephas.net/blog/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
