In scanning through it one question pops to mind. On page 7 it states that "trusted cache" was enabled on both CFMX Enterprise and CFMX for JRun but it does not state that it was turned on for CF5. Wouldn't that tend to skew the results in favor of the CFMX flavors from the outset? Right after the release of CFMX I seem to recall some folks discussing that file system access was noticeably slower under CFMX (particularly to Fusebox folks with lots of cfincludes) which makes me wonder what a more equivalent comparison between CF5 and CFMX would reflect.
Ken -----Original Message----- From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:34 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: CFMX on J2EE for Linux Performance Brief There's a new performance brief on DesDev for CFMX. It seems CFMX for J2EE on Linux smokes all other platforms...and is even more impressive when compared to CF5 on Linux...now I wonder what the metrics would look like on RedHat Advanced server using BEA's JRockit JVM (although not supported) !! Or better yet, CMFX for BEA running on RH AS! Another 10-25% gain? http://www.macromedia.com/desdev/mx/coldfusion/whitepapers/cfmx_jrun_per f_brief.pdf ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
