This might be a stupid question, but what's Fusebox? (Sorry, I'm a
newbie in the CF world)
SW
-----Original Message-----
From: Adrocknaphobia Jones
Sent: Mon 01/13/2003 02:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Cc:
Subject: RE: Design Pattern Question
Not one to start gossip, but I was under the influence that Hal
Helms
left the fusebox group. Is this true? If so why did he leave, if
not,
why is this rumor floating around?
Adam Wayne Lehman
Web Systems Developer
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Distance Education Division
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Brunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 12:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Design Pattern Question
Yes this is a good methodology to consider as we all move out of
procedural
methodologies to more 'OO' based concepts. Yet in my opinion
there is a
further dimension that Fusebox achieves, or has done for us,
that I have
not
yet seen expounded in CFMX tutorials etc.
Using Fusebox in conjunction with FLIP we have a complete
application
design
and development environment from concept-discussion through
coding-ongoing
maintenance. In addition by using Fusebox we have found it easy
to
bring in
developers who had never coded on CF before but who had a good
grasp of
HTML, JavaScript and/or ASP-JSP. Further by abstracting the
actual
Fuseaction values till run-time Fusebox truly affords the
capability at
another layer of separation, that of separating design from
development;
when combined with the very descriptive capabilities afforded by
the use
of
Fusedocs. Finally, the logicality of using Circuits as a
mapping/pathing
mechanism addresses to physical layout questions of developing a
web
application.
There is one last very important point here, there have been
many
previous
methodologies/frameworks applied to ColdFusion development.
What is
different in Fusebox is it has become the most widely used of
all of
them
and that is a very considerable factor for those of us using
teams of
developers that can change, grow, shrink etc.
I recommend you take a look at Hal Helms work
http://www.halhelms.com/webresources/fuseboxmxpreso/page1.htm as
CFMX
and
Fusebox are melded to form the next iteration of Fusebox.
Kind Regards - Mike Brunt
Webapper Services LLC
Web Site http://www.webapper.com
Blog http://www.webapper.net
Webapper <Web Application Specialists>
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Bagnato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 6:38 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Design Pattern Question
I think that this is a very healthy design methodology for CF.
Ben Forta has been harping for ages about the importance of
separating
the
display, application, and data layers from the CF applications.
The methodology outlined in that page presents this to the CF
environment.
It actually follows many of the well known and widely used J2EE
methodologies out there. That was something that always bugged
me about
FuseBox and other methodologies presented for CF.
Those are just my thoughts:
Peter Bagnato
-----Original Message-----
From: Cutter (CF_Talk) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 11:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Design Pattern Question
Has anyone here taken a detailed look at the CFMX (semi) OOP
design
pattern put forth at http://www.benorama.com? Is anyone here
using it?
Formed some opinions? Have anything to add (or subtract)? Know
who put
this together in the first place?
As one of my former commanders used to ask "Questions? Comments?
War
Stories?"
Cutter
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
Unsubscribe:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
