Scott Wilhelm writes: 

> This might be a stupid question, but what's Fusebox? (Sorry, I'm a
> newbie in the CF world)

http://www.fusebox.org. 

it's a fairly popular design methodology (started with CF, and i believe has 
been ported to PHP). 

Altho I understand that CFC's, now available in CFMX, kind of render fusebox 
moot (disclaimer: i do not know fusebox...i do not know for certain that 
fusebox is no longer 'worthwhile'...this is only something that i have heard 
in certain circles) :) 

charlie 

 

 

>  
> SW 
> 
>       -----Original Message----- 
>       From: Adrocknaphobia Jones 
>       Sent: Mon 01/13/2003 02:22 PM 
>       To: CF-Talk 
>       Cc: 
>       Subject: RE: Design Pattern Question
>       
>        
> 
>       Not one to start gossip, but I was under the influence that Hal
> Helms
>       left the fusebox group. Is this true? If so why did he leave, if
> not,
>       why is this rumor floating around?
>       
>       Adam Wayne Lehman
>       Web Systems Developer
>       Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
>       Distance Education Division
>       
>       
>       -----Original Message-----
>       From: Mike Brunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>       Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 12:13 PM
>       To: CF-Talk
>       Subject: RE: Design Pattern Question
>       
>       Yes this is a good methodology to consider as we all move out of
>       procedural
>       methodologies to more 'OO' based concepts.  Yet in my opinion
> there is a
>       further dimension that Fusebox achieves, or has done for us,
> that I have
>       not
>       yet seen expounded in CFMX tutorials etc.
>       
>       Using Fusebox in conjunction with FLIP we have a complete
> application
>       design
>       and development environment from concept-discussion through
>       coding-ongoing
>       maintenance.  In addition by using Fusebox we have found it easy
> to
>       bring in
>       developers who had never coded on CF before but who had a good
> grasp of
>       HTML, JavaScript and/or ASP-JSP.  Further by abstracting the
> actual
>       Fuseaction values till run-time Fusebox truly affords the
> capability at
>       another layer of separation, that of separating design from
> development;
>       when combined with the very descriptive capabilities afforded by
> the use
>       of
>       Fusedocs.  Finally, the logicality of using Circuits as a
>       mapping/pathing
>       mechanism addresses to physical layout questions of developing a
> web
>       application.
>       
>       There is one last very important point here, there have been
> many
>       previous
>       methodologies/frameworks applied to ColdFusion development.
> What is
>       different in Fusebox is it has become the most widely used of
> all of
>       them
>       and that is a very considerable factor for those of us using
> teams of
>       developers that can change, grow, shrink etc.
>       
>       I recommend you take a look at Hal Helms work
>       http://www.halhelms.com/webresources/fuseboxmxpreso/page1.htm as
> CFMX
>       and
>       Fusebox are melded to form the next iteration of Fusebox.
>       
>       Kind Regards - Mike Brunt
>       Webapper Services LLC
>       Web Site http://www.webapper.com
>       Blog http://www.webapper.net
>       
>       Webapper <Web Application Specialists>
>       
>       -----Original Message-----
>       From: Peter Bagnato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>       Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 6:38 PM
>       To: CF-Talk
>       Subject: RE: Design Pattern Question
>       
>       I think that this is a very healthy design methodology for CF.
>       
>       Ben Forta has been harping for ages about the importance of
> separating
>       the
>       display, application, and data layers from the CF applications.
>       
>       The methodology outlined in that page presents this to the CF
>       environment.
>       
>       It actually follows many of the well known and widely used J2EE
>       methodologies out there. That was something that always bugged
> me about
>       FuseBox and other methodologies presented for CF.
>       
>       Those are just my thoughts:
>       Peter Bagnato
>       
>       
>       -----Original Message-----
>       From: Cutter (CF_Talk) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>       Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 11:59 PM
>       To: CF-Talk
>       Subject: Design Pattern Question
>       
>       Has anyone here taken a detailed look at the CFMX (semi) OOP
> design
>       pattern put forth at http://www.benorama.com? Is anyone here
> using it?
>       Formed some opinions? Have anything to add (or subtract)? Know
> who put
>       this together in the first place?
>       
>       As one of my former commanders used to ask "Questions? Comments?
> War
>       Stories?"
>       
>       Cutter
>       
>       
>       
>       
>        
> 
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to