> I'm not sure .. anyone else have an opinion?
Since it was fairly easy to do - I ran loads of timing tests on the
difference between CFSet and CFParam.
CFParam runs about 1.1-1.2 times slower than a CFSet - BUT as has been
mentioned, using Application scoping speeds up the access loads - it's just
the first access of the application which is slower (server setting up the
registry/datasource/cookie entries)
Just a little beside point - Variables scope is the fastest that I've tested
so far as it requires little work from the server
Oh, and CFParam on an Application variable is about 4-5 times slower than a
CFParam on Variables scope...
Philip Arnold
ASP Multimedia Limited
T: +44 (0)20 8680 1133
"Websites for the real world"
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
**********************************************************************
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
