Not to take this thread too far off the original topic, but I too am a CFC
newbie and have been very interested in finding a good tutorial for creating
multi-step or back next forms based around CFCs.  If there are any
suggestions it would help me out.

Thanks,

Nate

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gyrus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 9:44 AM
Subject: Re: CFC set's & get's


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Raymond Camden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Let's say you have
> > a multi-step edit form. You may want to store the CFC in the session
> > scope so it persists. On the other hand, if you had a Create Article
> > form, you may create a local instance of CFC, store the data, and be
> > done with it.
> ----------------------------
>
> I'm a CF newbie, halfway through an intro book, and I thought I'd jump in
> here to ask something quite general that is closely related to all this.
>
> Since I'm generally basing my current CF efforts on the
> Model-Controller-View "pattern", I've taken it on board from several
sources
> that it's a good idea to use CFC's exclusively for the Model layer, i.e.
> interactions with data.
>
> So it's slightly confusing to read 'Discovering CFCs' and read all about
> "getters" and "setters" that just manipulate an object instance, nothing
to
> do with the DB.
>
> I fully appreciate that any intro to OO-related concepts would need to
cover
> this object manipulation as basic, and that it's possibly an abitrary
> decision on my part to use CFC's just for data calls.
>
> But to me (this is me-not-really-knowing-much-about-CFCs-and-OO-yet ;) it
> seems like this kind of OO behaviour is most suited to a "stateful"
> application environment like a desktop app or Java applet - not stateless
> toing-and-froing as per CF over the web.
>
> I've been trying to think of useful examples of CFC use that wouldn't
> involve data calls and would actually take advantage of an objects
> persistence and manipulability. I guess a User.cfc instance in the session
> scope could be useful - but how much more useful than a "user" structure
in
> the session scope?
>
> Multi-step forms is another possibility, holding data before committing it
> to the DB. But again, what real advantage over a structure? Am I just
> missing out on the actual practice of using CFC's, where their advantages
> become obvious?
>
> Gyrus
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> work: http://www.tengai.co.uk
> play: http://norlonto.net
> PGP key available
>
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to