Jim, > > 3) However, and here's the tricky part, although CFMX won't crash due to > poor locking there's also no gaurantee that it'll return proper values. > The internal locking (implemented in Hash Tables) is, as I understand > it, much more "atomic" than CF 5.0. > > If, for example, you have two nested structures I think that one could > be locked while the other isn't. This means that you might read the > "good" version of the child while the parent is being written (and, > presumably before the child is written too). >
I'm not certain, but this looks like a race condition to me. Just a thought... Regards Stephen ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
