Per Bryan's post below: Pretty much everyone in my office started with CF and then picked up FB along the way -- precisely because we needed a consistent methodology.
I spoke at the Fusebox conference last year regarding "Selling Fusebox to Managers: A Successful Case Study" -- it basically talks about our own FB experiences and why it works for us. You can access it at http://www.duodesign.com/presentations/. The main site for the case study, btw, has just been ported to cfmx: http://www.chicagoparkdistrict.com And just to be clear: I don't disagree with most of what's been said here, especially the reiteration of the "use what works for you" mantra. But for us, that's definitely FB3. Kelly Tetterton Technical Lead - duoDesign One Web Company. Twice the Results. 847.491.3000 | main 847.491.7125 | direct 847.491.3100 | fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.duodesign.com -----Original Message----- From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 3:39 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: FBX3 AND CFMX Couldn't have said it better myself Michael Do what works for you and your projects ;-) I still wouldn't mind hearing from the FBers out there.... Did you start CF with FB or pickup FB along the way? Bryan Stevenson B.Comm. VP & Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. t. 250.920.8830 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------- Macromedia Associate Partner www.macromedia.com --------------------------------------------------------- Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group Founder & Director www.cfug-vancouverisland.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 12:40 PM Subject: RE: FBX3 AND CFMX > Hi, > > Actually, I totally understand where you're coming from. I wasn't trying > to imply that Fusebox is better, because for some people it certainly is > not. And, you are right--A methodology is supposed to make development > smoother; or at least more standardized. If it doesn't then you > shouldn't use it. Given that Fusebox has been through so many changes > and because there are now several hybrids available that address many of > the issues developers have faced in the past, I was simply suggesting > that you re-test the waters to determine if the workaround issues you > are concerned with still exist. > > In any case, you seem to be very comfortable and productive within your > own methodology; that is all that truly counts. :) > > Best regards > MW > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 3:21 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: FBX3 AND CFMX > > > Nope..ya missed my point....CFMX migration was just an example. > but now we're heading towards what's better ;-) > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
