> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 1:49 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: FBX3 AND CFMX > > > Hi
Hi! > > I think the reason that people make so many variations > > of Fusebox is because they are constantly finding limitations. > > You could also say people are finding ways to improve the methodology > (framework), which, is a good thing in some cases. That is a great thing; everything has room for improvement! Maybe the Fusebox community should take a look at why there are so many hybrids out there, and if there is a legitimate reason for them, take into account the plethora of developers who might want to be in on the development of future versions. That is, of course, up to them. > > As you stated, there could be so many variations of it, and > > when troubleshooting one of those variations, it still takes > > the same amount of time to figure out the modified "framework" > > as it would any other "framework". > > FuseQ, one of the more popular Fusebox hybrids, just adds functionality > to Fusebox. You can use the FuseQ core files with any Fusebox 3 > application without fear of something breaking and without getting lost > in the code--you simply use as much or as little of the added > functionality as you would like. That sounds like the right way to add something; people troubleshooting the app would only have to familiarize themselves with FuseQ if they already knew Fusebox. --Andy ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
