This is a snippet of a response to the ZDNet article about Macromedia.com, I thought I'd pass it along here as well ...
<RANT> ... with RIA applications you will inherently have a longer load time because you're loading the entire application at once. With traditional web applications you get page-by-page loads which is faster initially, but overall I would imagine you sit and wait longer for traditional HTML pages when all is said and done. Think about it - 35 seconds to load an HTML page is slow, but to load 50 HTML pages it's pretty fast. That's what RIAs give you, the equivalent of an entire application in one page load. Most users don't complain about Microsoft Outlook taking 30 seconds to load, it's total lack of accessibility features and it's generally sluggish behavior when doing searches, etc. but when a web application doesn't load in 6 seconds and the link to the second version of the site in HTML doesn't leap out and grab your attention then everyone is up in arms. We're all accustomed to looking at application splash screens while waiting for desktop applications to load, why is it so outrageous for a web application to do the same? You have to realize, what Macromedia is doing is laying the groundwork for a whole new way to create applications, you can't expect that type of technology to be 100% from day 1. Eventually web applications will behave almost identically to desktop applications and in most cases will even replace them. I would hate to think that the future of software would be based on HTML. Flash, server-side processing and RIAs are the future of not only the web, but software as we know it. We need to be helpful and supportive of this process instead of being so critical. With support and positive feedback this process can mature and grow, Macromedia took their feedback and improved their product, that speaks volumes about their commitment to the future and to their developers. </RANT> Joshua Miller Head Programmer / IT Manager Garrison Enterprises Inc. www.garrisonenterprises.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] (704) 569-9044 ext. 254 ************************************************************************ ************* Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender states them to be the views of Garrison Enterprises Inc. This e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and contains information that is private and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please delete it immediately and advise us by return e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ************************************************************************ ************* -----Original Message----- From: Adrocknaphobia Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 11:38 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Macromedia.Com (The new site?) Ouch. ZDNet wasn't to kind about macromedia.com. http://news.zdnet.co.uk/story/0,,t269-s2131698,00.html Again, the new version is much better and I hope ZDNet writes a follow-up article on how Macromedia has graciously responded to all the criticism. But I do with Macromedia would stop touting this argument: "When you move from an HTML world into a much richer desktop-oriented world, that's a big change, and people just have difficulty with change," he said. "Any time you change a Web site, there's an initial week or so where people don't feel comfortable yet and you hear a lot of feedback." It's bullshit. If there is one thing that can be said about web developers, is that we are accustomed to change. From the tools we use to the technology, everything changes constantly. We're just critical of the wrong types of change, not change itself. Adam Wayne Lehman Web Systems Developer Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Distance Education Division -----Original Message----- From: Pablo Varando [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 6:53 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Macromedia.Com (The new site?) Well, Macromedia has changed the site with the feedback they received from the community. http://www.macromedia.com Like it better? Worse? They also released a report about what they learned (good and bad) from the first week of the new site. http://www.macromedia.com/special/progress_report/ (This is really interesting... you should read it..) Pablo ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
