Sorry Ray... my mind just drew a blank on who I'd discussed the pros/cons of using cfparam with this scope vars... :)
On Monday, Mar 17, 2003, at 06:40 US/Pacific, Raymond Camden wrote: > While I can take the blame for the infamous jedimasterwhopper bug > (sigh), I can't take the credit for Petmarket. :> > > ======================================================================= > Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Mindseye, Inc > Member of Team Macromedia > > Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Blog : www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus/blog > Yahoo IM : morpheus > > "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 7:25 PM >> To: CF-Talk >> Subject: Re: Pet Market cfc's >> >> >> This looks like the work of either Mike Nimer or Ray Camden... One of >> them, I can't remember which, is very fond of the >> cfparam-to-initialize-this-attributes idiom. >> >> I personally don't like it(!) because, to me, cfparam says "I'm being >> passed some parameters and I'll validate their types and set defaults >> for omitted ones" whereas for 'this.' attributes, you clearly are not >> being passed any parameters and, as you correctly observe, >> none of them >> will exist. I'd just use cfset instead. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
