>><cfset myhtml = "<html stuff=""here"">blah blah</html>">

> Building strings like the above for page out is quite slow
> is CFMX. Every tool has its specific use... i dont see a
> use for CustomTags in CFMX, other than building pages
> layouts.

You don't think there's any value in being able to express attributes by
name instead of arguments in a specific order? Or the attributecollection
attribute? I'm just curious. Of course, there's also still <cfassociate>,
although in most cases that's probably only really used for things like
<cf_form><cf_input></cf_form> as an alternative to the native cfform tag.


s. isaac dealey                954-776-0046

new epoch                      http://www.turnkey.to

lead architect, tapestry cms   http://products.turnkey.to

tapestry api is opensource     http://www.turnkey.to/tapi

certified advanced coldfusion 5 developer
http://www.macromedia.com/v1/handlers/index.cfm?ID=21816


> This is my view  on CFMX tools

> CFC - Business Logic and Data Layer models
> <CFSCRIPT> blocks for all calls to the CFC and variables
> setters for the page.
> <CFINLCUDE> all view pages. No Logic
> UDF used for same cfscript blocks.
> CustomTags just used for the page layouts.
> XML for application variables. There is alot of advantage
> using xml for configs..
> <ErrorAlert>
>  <Emails>
>   <Email type="admin"
>   status="true">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</Email>
>   <Email type="developer"
>   status="true">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</Email>
>  <Emails>
> </ErrorAlert>


> Joe Eugene


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to