Or just skip an app server and use static content.  ;)

I'm going to end my part in the discussion by saying "IMHO, locking a nasty
thing to deal with, but very necessary when dealing with shared scopes.
CFLOCK seems to be the most prevelant tool used to provide locking (and
usually the prefered means), but it is not the only one.  Use CFLOCK or
don't, just make sure you lock in one way or another, or are prepared to
deal with the consequences."

---
Barney Boisvert, Senior Development Engineer
AudienceCentral (formerly PIER System, Inc.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
voice : 360.756.8080 x12
fax   : 360.647.5351

www.audiencecentral.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 9:56 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: RE: Is there a trick...
>
>
> Of course.  All I'm saying is that it's perfectly possible for MM
> to "fix" (or perhaps neuter) MX so that race conditions don't happen :)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Barney Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wednesday, April 2, 2003 10:47 am
> Subject: RE: Is there a trick...
>
> > But that only takes care of the session scope.  You still have to
> > deal with
> > the application scope.  Well, i suppose you could set you server
> > to only
> > process one request at a time, but then you'd lose pretty much all
> > abilityto scale.
> >
> > ---
> > Barney Boisvert, Senior Development Engineer
> > AudienceCentral (formerly PIER System, Inc.)
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > voice : 360.756.8080 x12
> > fax   : 360.647.5351
> >
> > www.audiencecentral.com
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kwang Suh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 8:19 PM
> > > To: CF-Talk
> > > Subject: Re: Is there a trick...
> > >
> > >
> > > > I'm talking CFMX, and this example illustrates my point
> > exactly.  The
> > > server
> > > > CAN'T do the job of CFLOCK for situations exactly like this,
> > so you (the
> > >
> > > Sure it can.  Simply make the server single threaded.  Heck, lots
> > > of people
> > > went the lazy route and ticked on "singled threaded sessions" in
> > pre MX.
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89
70.4
                                

Reply via email to