oh ok, cool. not like I found on the cfmx known issues page. I wonder if either is better to use than the other?
tony weeg uncertified advanced cold fusion developer tony at navtrak dot net www.navtrak.net 410.548.2337 -----Original Message----- From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 3:42 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: cache-control >nope, this is from a form submission, to a page that displays results, >a click off that page to another page, and then the user clicking the >back button on their browser, and >*!BANG!* some effed up >error about the page no longer available or something.... I've successfully used this one line below in my MX apps and the problem has not cropped up: <cfheader name="cache-control" value="public"> Regards, Dave. _________________________________________________________________ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
