I don't have the exact answer to your question Jason. We did have similar
problem in the past. The client would not allow ODBC to be used at all.
Their claim, which I could/did not verify was that the overhead would kill
them. They were running a product called Universe. It ran on one server with
2-3 index servers. Was more stable than Advanced Revelations. I think they
went with ASP because it did not need to connect via ODBC.
Anyone else heard any complaints about ODBC overhead?
-Gary
> well, they are requiring that we interface with those programs - I'm not
> sure why, that is why i'm trying to find out more about them...
> they say it
> gives them performance gain etc...
>
> ?? je
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel-Laurence Cedilotte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 6:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: oracle - connectivity
>
>
> Why don't you try creating a DSN in the CFADMINISTRATOR for the oracle DB
> and that should get things on a roll...
>
> Dan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Egan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Cf-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 6:02 PM
> Subject: oracle - connectivity
>
>
> > I have a client that needs cf to talk to oracle -- np, but they already
> have
> > their applications (network apps) talking to the oracle server via
> weblogic
> > / TUX / JOLT. TBH I don't know what they are or if they can talk to cf.
> My
> > understanding thus far is they are similar to ODBC drivers for
> NT... they
> > are running HPUX v 11.
> >
> > Does anyone know about these products?
> >
> > Thanks
> > je
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
