> > SSL is only between the client (web browser) and > > the server (IIS, Apache, etc.) so CFMX is not really > > a factor. > > Actually, I recall people having problems with InstantSSL > and CFMX because the Sun JVM didn't have it listed as a > cert authority (around Dec '02). That's why I tied it to > CFMX.
For the most common use of SSL, to encrypt client connections to your web server, CFMX won't be an issue, since the web server will deal with the encryption and decryption of data sent to and received from the client. It may make a difference if you're using CFHTTP to talk to a server via SSL; in that case, the client (CFMX) needs to be able to verify the server certificate's chain of trust, so to speak. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
