> my head is in a fuzz, its just confusing why SQL Server > did not complain about licenses with CF5 but does with > CFMX installed, not unless its due to the co-existense > of 5 and MX.
Perhaps you weren't using as many database connections when you just had CF 5. Both CF 5 and CFMX use connection pooling; they attempt to reuse connections rather than creating new ones. However, if a new request comes in and no connection is available for use, each would have to create a new one. If you're running both, you're more likely to reach ten concurrent connections, I suspect. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
