>From a financial point of view, webex is very expensive. We are working
on projects with FlashComm for clients that are going to end up saving
quite a bit of money since they don't have to pay per seat in Webex. 

Dan Phillips
www.CFXHosting.com 
1-866-239-4678
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan F. Hogan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: 'Webinars'


http://www.webex.com/ is kind of nice

-----Original Message-----
From: David K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:30 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SOT: 'Webinars'


Client wants to do interactive 'Webinars'...

In the past I've participated in a couple of the Macromedia 'Webinars'
(pre-Breeze / pre-FlashComServer) where they were introducing a new
product, etc. These sessions had both an interactive visual component
(requiring the download and installation of some kind of viewer
application or plug-in) and an audio component (delivered over a bridged
phone line, if I recall correctly).

Anyone know what viewer app they were using?

And further, if anyone has _any_ suggestions or can point to resources
on alternative technologies for the delivery of interactive slide-show
style presentations (no matter how obvious or obscure) I would be
interested in hearing about those as well. Thanks.

--David K.




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq

Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to