On Wednesday, Jul 16, 2003, at 11:20 US/Pacific, Michael T. Tangorre
wrote:
> Some co-workers have asked me for some pros and cons to Fusebox 4 or
> Fusebox in general.
> I polled the Fusebox list awhile back and obviously got some biased
> results... anyone care to chime in.... I guess im really looking for
> some cons as I have a decent list of pros.
Have a read of:
http://www.corfield.org/index.php?fuseaction=fusebox.main
I'm not exactly a fan of FB - I've been *very* critical of it (and some
of its proponents!) in the past but, as you can see from the URL, I
rewrote my personal site using FB3/PHP for the experience, and wrote
that up too.
FB4 is a nice refinement of FB3, replacing the various CF
infrastructure files (that you had to modify every time you changed
anything) with a simple, clean XML file, as well as adding a plugin
system. I haven't spent much time looking at it but there's some clever
stuff in there (including the parsing and compilation of the XML down
to CF code I believe so that 'production mode' is much faster).
Mach II (nee Fusebox MX) is a radically different beast and also worth
looking at. I've started a fledgling area about it and will be building
a version of my site using Mach II soon (no idea where I'll deploy it
yet! :)
http://www.corfield.org/index.php?fuseaction=machii.main
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at
http://www.coolfusion.com
Unsubscribe:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
