This isn't at runtime.  This would work when a post back is done, however.

----- Original Message -----
From: jon hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:50 pm
Subject: Re: MSDN on CF -> ASP.net

> See Raymond's response :)
> 
> <cfif isDefined("caller.form")>
>    //hmmm spotted problem...should name defaults differently
>    <cfif attributes.value NEQ value>  <--- onChange
>          <cfset value = "Form submit successful and you changed 
> the default!">
>    <cfelse>
>          <cfset value="Form submit successful!">
>    </cfif>
> </cfif>
> 
> Could probably go really far and define onChange, onSubmit, etc.
> methods for each input. I'd prefer the form collection itself to 
> be an
> object though, instead of a structure. This would all be easier if so.
> 
> -- 
> jon
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Thursday, July 17, 2003, 2:32:23 PM, you wrote:
> ksc> As with Raymond's suggestion, you can't change them at runtime.
> 
> 
> ksc> ----- Original Message -----
> ksc> From: jon hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ksc> Date: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:28 pm
> ksc> Subject: Re: MSDN on CF -> ASP.net
> 
> >> Ok...if you insist.
> >> 
> >> input.cfm:
> >> <cfparam name="maxlength" default="255">
> >> <cfparam name="width" default="462">
> >> <cfparam name="type" default="text">
> >> <cfparam name="value" default="Hello There!">
> >> 
> >> <cfif isDefined("caller.form")>
> >>    <cfset value="Form submit successful!">
> >> </cfif>
> >> 
> >> <input id="#attributes.id#" type="#type#" width="#width#" 
> >> maxlength="#maxlength#" value="#value#">
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> callingpage.cfm:
> >> <cfimport taglib="extensions\customtags\ui" prefix="ui">
> >> 
> >> <form method="post">
> >>  <ui:input id="foo">
> >>  <input type="submit">
> >> <form>
> >> 
> >> Untested...but it should work. Obviously this would not be 
> usable 
> >> in a
> >> real world scenario, I would internally in input.cfm create a
> >> structure of some kind of each input contained in the calling page,
> >> and use that to reference which particular input I am 
> referencing, and
> >> would want to page some kind of page context as well. Of 
> course...I'm>> making up stuff on the fly here, there may be an 
> even better way.
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> jon
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> 
> >> Thursday, July 17, 2003, 1:44:32 PM, you wrote:
> >> ksc> You can change the properties of objects on the page in a 
> >> different place than where the object is instantiated.
> >> 
> >> ksc> Please show me the equivalent CF code.  Then we can make a 
> >> comparison.
> >> ksc> ----- Original Message -----
> >> ksc> From: Raymond Camden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> ksc> Date: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:37 am
> >> ksc> Subject: RE: RE: RE: MSDN on CF -> ASP.net
> >> 
> >> >> Um, how is this any different from
> >> >> 
> >> >> <cfimport ...>
> >> >> 
> >> >> <body>
> >> >> 
> >> >> Customer name <tag:foo>
> >> >> 
> >> >> ?
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> 
> ========================================================================>> ===
> >> >> Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Mindseye, Inc
> >> >> (www.mindseye.com)
> >> >> Member of Team Macromedia 
> >> >> (http://www.macromedia.com/go/teammacromedia)
> >> >> Email    : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> Blog     : www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus/blog
> >> >> Yahoo IM : morpheus
> >> >> 
> >> >> "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda 
> >> >> 
> >> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> >> >> > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:24 AM
> >> >> > To: CF-Talk
> >> >> > Subject: Re: RE: RE: MSDN on CF -> ASP.net
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Sure..
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Here's my .aspx page...
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > <% Page Inherits="myPage" CodeBehind="myPage.aspx.cs" %>
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > <html>
> >> >> > <head>
> >> >> > <title>My Page</title>
> >> >> > </head>
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > <body>
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Customer Name:
> >> >> > <asp:textbox id="txtCustomer" width="462px" runat="server" />
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > <br>
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > <asp:button id="btnSave" text="Save" runat="server" 
> >> >> > cssclass="button" />
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > </body>
> >> >> > </html>
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Here's my codebehind page...
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > using System;
> >> >> > using System.Web;
> >> >> > using System.Web.UI;
> >> >> > using System.Web.UI.WebControls;
> >> >> > using System.Web.UI.HtmlControls;
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > public class maintainGroup : System.Web.UI.Page
> >> >> > {
> >> >> >    protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox txtCustomer;
> >> >> >    protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button btnSave;
> >> >> >       
> >> >> >    // Runs when the page loads
> >> >> >    protected void Page_Load(object sender, 
> System.EventArgs e)
> >> >> >    {
> >> >> >       // Let's give the textbox some text.
> >> >> >       txtCustomer.Text = "Hello There!";
> >> >> >       // Let's give it a maxlength.
> >> >> >       txtCustomer.MaxLength = 255;
> >> >> >       
> >> >> >       // Let's make the button call a method when it's 
> clicked.>> >> >       btnSave.Click += new EventHandler(this.FooBar);
> >> >> >    }
> >> >> >    
> >> >> >    protected void FooBar(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
> >> >> >    {
> >> >> >       // Let's change the text in the button.
> >> >> >       btnSave.Text = "You clicked me!";
> >> >> >    }
> >> >> >    
> >> >> > }
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> >> > From: Raymond Camden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> > Date: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:35 am
> >> >> > Subject: RE: RE: MSDN on CF -> ASP.net
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > > Can you give a very small example of this, i.e. real code?
> >> >> > > 
> >> >> > > 
> >> >> > 
> >> >> 
> >> 
> ======================================================================> > ==
> >> >> > > ===
> >> >> > > Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Mindseye, Inc
> >> >> > > (www.mindseye.com)
> >> >> > > Member of Team Macromedia 
> >> >> > > (http://www.macromedia.com/go/teammacromedia)
> >> >> > > Email    : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> > > Blog     : www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus/blog
> >> >> > > Yahoo IM : morpheus
> >> >> > > 
> >> >> > > "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> >> >> > > 
> >> >> > > > -----Original Message-----
> >> >> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> > > > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:21 AM
> >> >> > > > To: CF-Talk
> >> >> > > > Subject: Re: RE: MSDN on CF -> ASP.net
> >> >> > > > 
> >> >> > > > 
> >> >> > > > The paragraph is correct.
> >> >> > > > 
> >> >> > > > You can write a presentation layer in ASP.NET with 
> absolutely>> >> > > > zero application logic.  All the time.  With 
> no exceptions.
> >> >> > > > 
> >> >> > > > This still isn't possible in CF, or JSP, or ASP, or 
> PHP, 
> >> etc...>> > > > 
> >> >> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> >> > > > From: Mike Brunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> > > > Date: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:07 am
> >> >> > > > Subject: RE: MSDN on CF -> ASP.net
> >> >> > > > 
> >> >> > > > > I'm on my way out so can't read all, but paragraph 3 
> >> >> > deserves some 
> >> >> > > > > kind of
> >> >> > > > > response: -
> >> >> > > > > 
> >> >> > > > > "ColdFusion follows the same development and page 
> >> >> > execution model 
> >> >> > > > > as that of classic ASP, PHP, JSP, and other similar 
> >> >> > Web-scripting 
> >> >> > > > > languages. Specifically, code is embedded in HTML 
> >> >> > markup, and as a 
> >> >> > > > > given
> >> >> > > page
> >> >> > > > > executesfrom top to bottom, the output of the code's 
> >> execution>> > > > > takes the place of
> >> >> > > > > the embedded code in the resulting HTML document. 
> This 
> >> >> > > development
> >> >> > > > > model is
> >> >> > > > > easy to grasp, but it does have a number of 
> drawbacks. 
> >> Chief>> > > among
> >> >> > > > > these is
> >> >> > > > > the lack of separation between application logic and
> >> >> > > presentation
> >> >> > > > > markup.Mixing code and presentation makes the code 
> >> harder to
> >> >> > > read,
> >> >> > > > > which increases
> >> >> > > > > the time and effort involved in maintenance, and creates
> >> >> > > significant> > challenges for non-programming graphic 
> designers>> >> > > who need to
> >> >> > > > > modify a page.
> >> >> > > > > Over the years, ColdFusion has introduced several 
> ways to
> >> >> > > mitigate
> >> >> > > > > this lack
> >> >> > > > > of separation, including custom tags, and others-but the
> >> >> > > > > fundamental model
> >> >> > > > > remains."
> >> >> > > > > 
> >> >> > > > > What about cfc's and for those who really want to 
> move 
> >> >> more OO 
> >> >> > > > > concepts CF and Mach II.  This is typical MS BS and 
> >> >> deserves a 
> >> >> > > > > response
> >> >> > > from
> >> >> > > > > MM in my
> >> >> > > > > opinion.  (A lot of bloody abbreviations there!).
> >> >> > > > > 
> >> >> > > > > Kind Regards - Mike Brunt
> >> >> > > > > Webapper Services LLC
> >> >> > > > > Web Site http://www.webapper.com
> >> >> > > > > Blog http://www.webapper.net
> >> >> > > > > 
> >> >> > > > > Webapper <Web Application Specialists>
> >> >> > > > > 
> >> >> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> >> >> > > > > From: Jesse Houwing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> > > > > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:44 AM
> >> >> > > > > To: CF-Talk
> >> >> > > > > Subject: MSDN on CF -> ASP.net
> >> >> > > > > 
> >> >> > > > > First it explains what both ASP.net and Coldfusion 
> are 
> >> and 
> >> >> that 
> >> >> > > > > they share a similar background. A simpel feature 
> >> >> comparison is 
> >> >> > > > > used to
> >> >> > > show
> >> >> > > > > how one can
> >> >> > > > > convert a Coldfusion Application to ASP.net.
> >> >> > > > > 
> >> >> > > > > It contains a few errors, especially 'forgetting' to 
> >> >> > mention that 
> >> >> > > > > a lot of functionality is available in the standard 
> >> JAVA 
> >> >> API's 
> >> >> > > > > which
> >> >> > > van be
> >> >> > > > > directlyaccessed from coldfusion (Image support in 
> >> ASP.net is
> >> >> > > also
> >> >> > > > > only available
> >> >> > > > > through teh .Net framework, the same applies to SAX XML
> >> >> > > support and
> >> >> > > > > Threading).
> >> >> > > > > 
> >> >> > > > > They conclude that ASP.net is more reliable, faster 
> >> >> > scaling better 
> >> >> > > > > etc. etc. without showing any figures ro numbers.
> >> >> > > > > 
> >> >> > > > > Read it for yourself:
> >> >> > > > > 
> >> >> > > > > 
> >> >> 
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-
> >> >> > > > > us/dnaspp/html/coldfusiontoaspnet.asp
> >> >> > > > > 
> >> >> > > > > Jesse
> >> >> > > > > 
> >> >> > > > > 
> >> >> > > > 
> >> >> > > 
> >> >> > 
> >> >> 
> >> ksc> 
> >> 
> ksc> 
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq

Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to