The design pattern is not dependent upon sessioning. If it's the case that their example uses persistent EJBs, it's just coincidence.
What it seems like you're asking is what is the impact of using session CFCs (regardless of design patterns). Well, you'd have to try it and find out. ----- Original Message ----- From: Erik Yowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, July 18, 2003 3:17 pm Subject: RE: CFC Session Facade Pattern > Perhaps I should clarify - looking at the JavaDocs and structure of > their pattern it seems as though you one could have say a ShoppingCart > object stored session state that implements multiple desperate > components based upon whatever. Say this one CFC is also extending a > CartItem component. Okay - so now we have a memory resident CFC, > extending another with multiple methods invoking a whole 'nother > set of > components (other facades, etc). Is it just me or does that sound > like a > whole lot of weight to store in a session? Not knowing how session > persistent CFCs are handled in CFMX memory (or how well) makes me > curious. Pardon my ignorance on OOP patterns, learning something new > every day. > > Erik Yowell > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.shortfusemedia.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 2:03 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: CFC Session Facade Pattern > > > > Erm, they're not talking about session persistence. They're talking > about > > taking a complex set of steps (a "session") and simplifying it. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Erik Yowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Friday, July 18, 2003 2:55 pm > > Subject: CFC Session Facade Pattern > > > > > I�ve got a couple of CFC-type questions to whoever would be > interested > > > in answering, or has had experience in this realm: > > > > > > Regarding something like a Session Fa�ade pattern ( as illustrated > > > > http://technet.oracle.com/sample_code/tech/java/j2ee/vsm12/vsmpatterns.h > > > tml#SessionFacade ), would the same state-level advantages hold > > > true for > > > session persistent CFCs in CFMX? What kind of overhead would one > > > expectimplementing a CFC Fa�ade of such degree in CFMX? Is it even > > > worthinvestigating? Perhaps I�m being lazy and not experimenting > > > myself, just > > > thought I�d toss this out the list to see if others have had > > > positive/negative experiences, being as CFCs are so new in > > > implementation. > > > > > > Erik Yowell > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://www.shortfusemedia.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
