Hi, >> Seriously, how do you measure that?
I think, largely, it is measured against personal experience. If I had the opportunity to work with you directly and to learn how you do things, I may indeed find your methods to be superior--and that would be wonderful. I would then have another standard to apply to my "formula". The people I have talked with that do feel Fusebox works, speak from their experiences both individually and within teams, but rarely compare Fusebox to other frameworks or methodologies. >> In that case, are they successful because of Fusebox? I am sure it plays a role in their success. Is Fusebox the driving force behind their success? I doubt it. The very fact that the individual took the time to learn any framework says allot about the individual's character and desires. I totally agree that the success of a project, Fusebox or otherwise, is based more on the people involved than the methods used. I have seen some really crappy Fusebox apps and some really great ones. Best regards, Michael Wilson ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.cfhosting.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
