Matt Liotta wrote: > It just seems like it wouldn't be in anyone's interest to formally > specify the connection behavior of cfquery since that would mean it > couldn't change in the future. Basically what I am saying is that if > you are willing to give up control over the connections then you > shouldn't expect the connection behavior to be specified or even > consistent across releases.
I would prefer for cftransaction to have an attribute to set the access-mode of the transaction. And even if they document the current behaviour with regard to the use of connections that doesn't mean it won't ever change. It would just have to be documented if it changed. Jochem ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
