I don't think it's being picky...one of the most important things in software development is calling things what they are imo.
Personally I think function is better, if only because it helps differentiate CF from Java. -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, July 29, 2003, 7:10:54 PM, you wrote: MTT> Why is the naming not consistent? MTT> For instance... Inside a cfcomponent tag you can have functions (cffunction) MTT> yet when you publish this as a web service you use MTT> http://someUrl/someDir/componentName.cfc?method=methodName in the url. Why MTT> not call method function or function method in the CFC.... MTT> I know this is picky, but is there a reason behind it? MTT> Mike MTT> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
