On Monday, Aug 11, 2003, at 10:25 US/Pacific, Alan Ford wrote: > We have loads with session scope, but I can't recall any that are > anything other than short and sweet (I'll check the code).
Note that there was a bug in CFMX where a lock on session scope actually behaved more like a lock on application scope - all sessions would lock. This bug is fixed in CFMX 6.1 (this was a bug my team hit late in the day and the CF product team were awesome in getting it fixed for launch). > But if it was a cflock problem, and I have 5 second timeouts on every > cflock, wouldn't I expect to see bunches of errors where it fails to > obtain a lock? I do very occasionally see these at session level, but > more often than not I just see thread timeout messages (32 secs). It might well be that enough threads queue up waiting for locks that your system is overwhelmed... I'd really recommend upgrading to CFMX 6.1 as soon as you can. Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
