I had a problem recently that boiled down to:

A page, which had a link containing session token information (and an
absence of no-cache instructions), was called initially without the
session token in the URL.

Normally, this would be no problem. That is, until you consider
caching servers. (I'd never had to worry about caching servers before,
so I didn't really know about the pitfalls they can introduce.) A
caching server would cache this page (with the session token-ed link),
and serve it to other users on that ISP. This, obviously, leads to a
host of problems. If the page had had the session token in the
requested URL, there would be no problem, since the caching server
would consider this a unique page.

So, I fixed the problem (using no-cache header instructions, and some
code on page two that detects cached info), and made a mental note
never to let a page contain session information without calling it
with session information in the URL.

Okay, part two:

On a new project, it looks like I'm going to be able to count on users
having cookies enabled. However, I'm having a difficult time getting
my head around how that affects cached pages. Since there's no session
information being passed around in the URL, won't the second person
from ISP-X see the first person from ISP-X's personalized page?

I guess my question is: Can I count on no-cache header instructions to
be honored by all caching servers (is it bullet-proof)?

Are there any other considerations/ramifications of caching that I
might not know about?

Thanks,
Jamie
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq

Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to