> Why would anyone want to?
because it's faster to write. Don't get me wrong... I loved the tag syntax
back in the day when I was learning CF, but now it just slows me down.
> You can't set the access type, you can't specify the return type, you
> can't specify any argument types.
Is there a CF wish list? I was looking for one the other day but couldn't
find it.
public struct remote Method( string s, int i ){ ... }
:)
> You can still use <cfscript> for the *body* of all your functions
> (after the <cfset> tags for your 'var' scope local variables!).
...and I do. Wherever I can get away with it.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:18 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: UDF in CFC's - was: CFC Issues....
>
>
> On Wednesday, Aug 20, 2003, at 17:53 US/Pacific, Paul Spitzer wrote:
> >> <cfscript>
> >> function boring() { return now(); }
> >> </cfscript>
> > wow!.. I didn't know you could do that.
>
> Why would anyone want to?
>
> You can't set the access type, you can't specify the return type, you
> can't specify any argument types.
>
> You can still use <cfscript> for the *body* of all your functions
> (after the <cfset> tags for your 'var' scope local variables!).
>
> Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
>
> "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
> -- Margaret Atwood
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more
resources for the community.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
