>> > > It strucks me that there must be a way to do some sort >> > > of 'clustered' processing, which is sort of analogous >> > > to 'server clustering' if my basic understanding of >> > > 'server clustering' is correct. >> > > >> > > Hear this, one complex request (the request actually >> > > has several parts) needs an extremely complex query, >> > > now, is there any way to delegate 'each part' of a >> > > complex request to 'each process unit/script', then, >> > > make 'each process unit' return resultset to a common >> > > resultset unit? >> > > >> > > Or this sort of problem is usually adequately solved >> > > by CF servers clustering? Since I've never used >> > > server clustering I'm in the dark about that. >> > >> > It's called distributed computing. A popular layman's >> > example would be [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do a google search. >> > >> > In CF? Could be done at a certain level. >> >> "In CF? Could be done at a certain level." >> I would appreciate it if you could elaborate it a bit >> further. To validate your point. > >Ask a vague question, get a vague answer. Several developers have been able to capture the essence of my posting.
>You could easily build a >(clunky,inefficient) It defeats the purpose. >distributed computing interface using multiple CF machines and, >say, the CFHTTP tag to have one machine send parts of a problem to the >others. But CF is the last thing I'd want to use for that, myself. > >> The goal of [EMAIL PROTECTED] is totally different from what I'd >> like to achieve with the subject matter. You were talking >> about sort of similar method. Distributed computing, parallel >> computing is way ahead of 'clustered processing'. > >No, I don't think it is - what you're describing certainly falls within the >realm of distributed computing, and doesn't sound that different from >[EMAIL PROTECTED] or distributed.net. On a more easily approached level for us CF >programmers, SQL Server 2000 allows you to create "federated servers", I know a bit about "federated servers", but that's not applicable here. Thanks for your time. >which >can cooperate in building a recordset using distributed partitioned views. > >Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software >http://www.figleaf.com/ >voice: (202) 797-5496 >fax: (202) 797-5444 > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
