Good points and here are more.  I just got back from Fusebox 2003 in Las
Vegas; in terms of new versions-items this was the best Fusebox conference
since Fusebox was launched.  Fusebox 4.0 and Mach II are both very powerful
frameworks.  Fusebox 4.0 is for those staying with the procedural
methodology of classic CF applications.  Mach II along with CFMX 6.1 really
opens us up to the power of CFC's.  I encourage all to talk a look.

http://www.fusebox.org/ for Fusebox 4.0

http://www.mach-ii.com for Mach II

Kind Regards - Mike Brunt
Webapper Services LLC
Web Site http://www.webapper.com
Blog http://www.webapper.net

Webapper <Web Application Specialists>

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Brodie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 8:05 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CF usage growing or shrinking? (was DWMX 2004 - Whats new for us? )

I agree with Stacy on this point. Over the last 3 months in my experiance,
I've seen more of a willingness to go with a CF solution. Before that, there
was very little activity.

But the coversation has not been one about technology, rather its about
practicalities. Quite a few have been burned with never-ending development
projects using the latest technologies such as pure J2EE and .net. When
people learn they can have the the engine (and potentally the functionality
if needed) a Hummer at the cost of a Honda Civic, all of the sudden people
begin to listen. They need to check the J2EE or .net box.

What people want is software developed in a reasonable time that works and
can fix without having to break the bank. It turns out people are shying
away from complex hard to manage and maintain solutions.

Jeremy Brodie
Intelix
an Edgewater Technology Solutions Company

web: http://www.edgewater.com
phone:(703) 815-2500
nasdaq symbol: EDGE


>I'd bet that with cfmx 7 they're going to really gear it for medium to
>large biz. Support for managing CF in clusters, auto deployment
>etc...maybe a bigger price tag. Higher revenue with perhaps slightly
>smaller market in terms of install base.
>
>Just a guess
>
>Stace

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

Reply via email to