Yea, I'd either use cfparam ... or sometimes it can be easier to use structappend(struct,struct2,false) for this...
isaac ------ Original Message ------ From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sep 02, 2003 08:06 PM Subject: RE: Efficient way to handle undefined variables >Yes, you can > >-----Original Message----- >From: J E VanOver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 02 September 2003 20:01 >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: Efficient way to handle undefined variables > > >I don't see why not. The variable name passed to "<cfparam" is just a >string. Dynamically build the string. Have you tried it? > >J > >-----Original Message----- >From: Mauricio Giraldo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:47 AM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: Efficient way to handle undefined variables > > >sorry for the double post... clocked post by error > >>That's what <cfparam is for, isn't it? > >can you cfparam dynamically named vars? > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.cfhosting.com
