thanks charlie.... ill do some more research and then make the transition slowly....
thanks again! tony weeg sr. web applications architect navtrak, inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.navtrak.net office 410.548.2337 fax 410.860.2337 -----Original Message----- From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 11:09 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: <cfquery syntax Tony: check out this article by Mr Forta. pretty good on explaining the reasons for using cfqueryparam: http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/mx/coldfusion/articles/ben_forta_faster .html as far as never having used it and not having probs...well, the same thing can be said about cflock. you don't *have* to lock your shared scope vars. your app will still run. but *should* you lock your shared scope vars? yes. I know where you're coming from. i only recently started using it. it wasn't around when i started CF, and I'm a creature of habit. found it difficult to even justify writing the extra code, which just seemed to make my SQL code that much more difficult to read. after reading enough articles like ben's above (our own Dave W. has one as well at http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/mx/coldfusion/articles/cfqueryparam.htm l that's worth a read), i started to force myself in the interest of writing better code. now, i see a query without cfqueryparam (usually my own old code), and i cringe. it's a difficult transition to make, i know, when you're used to just banging out SQL (and it works). but this transition is well worth the effort, in my opinion (for whatever that's worth) :) charlie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Weeg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 7:32 AM Subject: RE: <cfquery syntax > but what impact does it have on sql server 2000 ent edition. > > we don't use oracle...does this same logic apply? > > tony weeg > sr. web applications architect > navtrak, inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.navtrak.net > office 410.548.2337 > fax 410.860.2337 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Deanna Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 10:30 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: <cfquery syntax > > > Tony, > It's faster for the database, not necessarily for CF. In Oracle, > there's this chunk of memory used for sql snippets. When a new query > comes in, it looks there first, to see if it already exists. If it > does, it yanks the data from there, instead of re-running/re-optimzing > the query. (I would imagine there's something similar in other > databases.) > > Anyway, using queryparam makes it so that two queries searching for > different values in the where clause look like the same query to > Oracle. In other words: select * from mytable where id = 1 is not the > same as select * from mytable where id =2 But, if you use > queryparams... select > * from mytable where id = <cfqueryparam cfsqltype="cf_sql_integer" > value="1"> is the same to the query pool as select * from mytable where > id = <cfqueryparam cfsqltype="cf_sql_integer" value="2"> > > The query param gets translated to a "bind variable," and Oracle knows > that it's the same query except for this one variable. That's what > makes it faster. -d > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tony Weeg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 8:38 AM > Subject: RE: <cfquery syntax > > > > faster than the raw data being in there? > > how can that be? > > > > that's just one more tag that cfserver has to interpret process > > etc...albeit a millisecond or less, enough of them could be slower? > > > > im not sure I get that logic? > > > > tony weeg > > sr. web applications architect > > navtrak, inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > www.navtrak.net > > office 410.548.2337 > > fax 410.860.2337 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Craig Dudley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 9:23 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: <cfquery syntax > > > > > > Because it's safer and faster and is therefore considered best > > practice. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 04 September 2003 14:16 > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: <cfquery syntax > > > > > > why should one ALWAYS use cfqueryparam? > > > > I havent, EVER and have many apps, on many servers > > and no problems....just wondrin' > > > > tony weeg > > sr. web applications architect > > navtrak, inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > www.navtrak.net > > office 410.548.2337 > > fax 410.860.2337 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Pascal Peters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 8:14 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: <cfquery syntax > > > > > > You see the ? BECAUSE of the cfqueryparam and this is not an error. > > It > > > is just a placeholder for the value. And you should ALWAYS use > > <cfqueryparam> The only exception you can make is for static values > > like "isActive = 1" or something. And even then you can't go wrong > > using them. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bushy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: donderdag 4 september 2003 14:06 > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: re: <cfquery syntax > > > > > > I checked the database and there seems to be something wrong with > > the <cfqueryparam> because when I check the fields using SQL Query > > Analyzer there are question marks "?" in the fields which I think is > > an error trying to update the fields? > > > > Do I need the <cfqueryparam>? > > > > > > On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 07:55:24 -0400, Bushy wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > What's wrong with the below syntax? I think the single quotes > > > around > > > > the "commalist" is throwing it for a loop? How can I get around > > > this? If I use double quotes I'll run into the same problem around > > > the "ListGetAt..." code. > > > > > > <cfquery name="Insert" datasource="prefs"> > > > UPDATE tblProfiles > > > SET > > > strSelect='<cfqueryparam value="#ListGetAt(commalist,1,'|')#" > > cfsqltype="CF_SQL_LONGVARCHAR">' > > > WHERE strUsername='#auth#' > > > </cfquery> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
