> What we have done is re-implement the CFX API in .NET and then hosted > that inside of a CFX tag implemented as a DLL. This eliminates the need > for COM with ColdFusion prior to CFMX and eliminates the Java-COM > bridge with CFMX. Thus allowing you to develop a CFX tag in any .NET > language including J#, which interestingly enough means that any > Java-based CFX tags can be recompiled in J# with often nothing more > than a change to the import statements.
Excellent. Is there going to be an evaluation version available? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
