While it might not create new demand for CF, I think it would make more CF houses interested in the Linux version. We're switching to the Linux version soon, so I've been trying to keep an eye on what things we might not be able to do.
-Kevin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sean A Corfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:07 AM Subject: Re: .NET integration without COM > On Monday, Sep 8, 2003, at 06:40 US/Pacific, Thomas Chiverton wrote: > > On Monday 08 Sep 2003 14:27 pm, Matt Liotta wrote: > >> We did the write the DLL in C++, so you can call .NET assemblies > >> directly. However, the DLL is native to Windows, thus an SO will need > >> to be written for *nix to support Mono. > > I'd like to suggest you do so - this will greatly broaden the use of > > CF, as > > it'll then be able to support 'native' Linux .Net apps... > > I'd be very surprised if .NET-on-Linux created demand for CF. Can you > explain your logic? > > Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ > > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." > -- Margaret Atwood > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
