IIRC = If I Recall Correctly -Kevin
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Faircloth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 6:16 PM Subject: RE: RE: RE: Image manipulation > Right...that's what occurs when resampling is specified for the image... > Pixels dimensions can be reduced, document size can be reduced, > resolution can be reduced, and file size decreases... > > Without resampling, file size doesn't change... > > Rick > > BTW...I never have been able to figure out what "IIRC" is...what does > that stand for? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 6:21 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: RE: RE: Image manipulation > > > > > > IIRC, If you're using Photoshop, then when you are > > resizing/reshaping/whatever, make sure that you change the > > DPI and the pixel sizes at the same time for the web ready images. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:39 pm > > Subject: RE: RE: Image manipulation > > > > > That part I got...what I wasn't factoring in was the > > "resampling" that > > > was taking place when I was resizing the images... > > > > > > When resampling occurs, the image is changed. When resizing > > > occurs without resampling, a new image is not created. > > > > > > I think, if I'm not mistaken, that when you say "you'd have to > > > *resample*your image to 1500*2100 pixels..." you reallly mean > > > *resize*, because > > > *resampling* causes the confusion we had earlier. > > > > > > I need to *resample* when creating thumbnails or onscreen display > > > versions.That reduces file size...resizing without resampling does > > > not reduce file > > > size > > > and is therefore a bad practice for onscreen display images. > > > For printing, images should be *resized*, but not *resampled*. > > > > > > If you work with Photoshop, and work with resizing as well as > > > resamplingimages, which can both be done at the same time, you'll > > > know what I'm > > > referring to... > > > > > > Rick > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:41 PM > > > > To: CF-Talk > > > > Subject: Re: RE: Image manipulation > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't understand why you're having such problems with > > > > this. An 8X10 image @ 300 dpi is a 2400 X 3000 pixel image. > > > > Resize this image to whatever pixel dimensions you want for > > > > display purposes. You're confusing yourself with the 72dpi. > > > > That's irrelevant. Don't worry about it. > > > > > > > > For a 5X7 @ 300 dpi, you'd have to resample your image to > > > > 1500 * 2100 pixels. > > > > > > > > For a 4X6 @ 300 dpi, you have 1200 * 1800 pixels. > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Date: Thursday, September 11, 2003 11:12 am > > > > Subject: RE: Image manipulation > > > > > > > > > It was the resampling that was complicating the > > > > discussion...my bad... > > > > > > > > > > But that brings me back to my original question about the > > > CF image > > > > > manipulation tags. I want to be able to automatically > > > resample > > the images > > > > > for display so the file size is smaller while keeping the > > > > > originals (if they > > > > > are > > > > > scanned or taken at higher resolutions) at the same ppi. > > > > > > > > > > I don't know yet whether or not any of the tags will > > > perform that > > > > > function. > > > > > I want to be able to upload a hi-res 8x10 image, have it > > > downsized > > (dimensions only) > > > > > to a 5x7 and 4x6 (still at same ppi, if the camera's ppi > > > setting is > > > > > variable) > > > > > then resample the image to 72 ppi for display on the > > > website. The > > > > > 8x10,5x7, and 4x6 > > > > > are for downloading, saving, and printing...that's what > > > > I'm trying to > > > > > accomplish. > > > > > > > > > > Anyone know what tag can do this? CFX_Image? > > > > > CF_MagickTag/ImageMagick?CFX_ImageCR from Efflare? > > > > > > > > > > If CFX_ImageCR can accomplish all of that... ppi > > > manipulation and > > > > > resampling, too, > > > > > then it'll be worth $149, easily... > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your help... > > > > > > > > > > Rick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Claude Schneegans [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:32 PM > > > > > > To: CF-Talk > > > > > > Subject: Re: Image manipulation > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Can't agree there...perhaps we're comparing > > > apples to > > > > > oranges... > > > > > > > Excatly: you are comparing two different images! > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Took the same photo and resampled it to 72 > > pixels per > > > > > inch (ppi), > > > > > > 360 pixels wide, and 503 pixels high. (Maximum > > > quality JPEG > > > > > setting) > > > > > > > When you "resample" an image this way you get a > > > different > > image. > You say yourself one is "1501 > > > pixels wide", the other > > > > > one is > > > > > > 360 pixels. > > > > > > Of course, if you print them at the same size, thay > > > won't > > > look the same. > > > > > > Here are your apples and oranges. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>I'm not sure if we're missing something in this > > > discussion, > > > > > > > > > I'm pretty sure I'm not ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Does using "ppi" as opposed to "dpi" to refer to > > > > > > resolution make any difference in our discussion? > > > > > > > > > > > > If you see a difference between a pixel and a dot, > > > yes it > > > > > > could make a difference, but for me it doesn't. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~| > > > > > > Archives: > > > http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 > > > > > > Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 > > > > > > Unsubscribe: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=70 > 8.628.4 > > > > > > Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up > > with the > > > > latest news > > > > in ColdFusion and related topics. > > > > http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > ~~~~~~~~| > > > Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 > > > Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 > > > Unsubscribe: > > > > > http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=708.628.4 > > > > Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with > > > the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. > > > http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
