> > Now they'll have to go through over 225,000 messages to see what we > > want in CF > > and where we want it to go (NNTP, full protocol support, enhanced > > scheduling, > > Studio, etc.). Even with threading and subject sorting, it's not going > > to be > > something easy. > > > Studio seems like a pretty obvious want from the community. However, I > was hoping you could clarify what you mean by full protocol support and > enhanced scheduling. > > BTW, I wasn't aware that NNTP was in such high demand from CFers. Full protocol as in full communication protocols. We've got FTP, HTTP, SMTP, POP but there are others like NNTP that are missing. I'm not putting NNTP itself on the top of the list, but it's one of the most commonly used protocols that's missing from CF. A CFSocket tag might take care of it while a CFSocket and a CFNNTP (and maybe even a CFTelnet) might be nice. I'm just looking for the complete spread.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=i:4:137433 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
