Well, wait then and see what ads up. Fight the battles that really need to be fought (where bottlenecks are) and don't slow down your development process with fighting battles that won't necessarily impact performance enough to worry about.
H. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Howard Owens Internet Operations Cordinator Ventura County Star / E.W. Scripps Co. www.venturacountystar.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: GoCatGo1956 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > -----Original Message----- > From: Samuel Neff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 6:51 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: cfc vs cfinclude > > 'cause sometimes the little things add up. :-) > > Sam > > > ---------------------------------------------- > Blog: http://www.rewindlife.com > Chart: http://www.blinex.com/products/charting > ---------------------------------------------- > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:21 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: cfc vs cfinclude > > > > > > (Why are people so focused on micro-performance issues instead of the > > bigger picture stuff?) > > > > Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=i:4:137631 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
