And I would *not* recommend the MSSQL JDBC drivers. Take the couple thousand you save from the Standard version and buy JTurbo from the NewAtlanta guys. Buy ServletExec while you're at it and you can play with Java to your heart's content. Our give BlueDragon a try and get Java plus CF5 for less (far less) than the CFMX Standard, esp if you're not using Flash remoting, etc.
Regards,
John Paul Ashenfelter
CTO/Transitionpoint
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
From: Samuel Neff
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 11:19 AM
Subject: RE: MX Standard or Enterprise?
If you're using MSSQL then I'd suggest enterprise, unless you're comfortable
installing the MSSQL JDBC drivers yourself and setting them up as an Other
data source. Try downloading the trial and seeing if you can install the
JDBC driver and connect using an Other data source. If you can, then you're
fine with Standard (as far as this issue goes). If not, go Enterprise.
If you have any interest in Java, then I'd strongly suggest enterprise--it's
just more forward looking. The multiple instances and integrated JRun
installation is great.
My $0.02.
Sam
----------------------------------------------
Blog: http://www.rewindlife.com
Chart: http://www.blinex.com/products/charting
----------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: Phillip B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 11:03 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: MX Standard or Enterprise?
I'm using CF 5 Enterprise right now and want to upgrade to MX. I looked
through Macromedia's website, reading the FAQ's, watching the flash
presentations, and looking at comparisons charts. It looks like all I need
is the standard edition but I don't want to get it and realize I should have
grabbed the Enterprise version instead.
I would like the option to use the java features of Enterprise. I have yet
to find a problem with the current cfmail with the exception of zero byte
files. I don't need load balancing or clustering. I'm not sure what server
logs are not included with standard but I would like to see what the heck is
going on. Is the system monitoring just a little nicer then the CF 5
version? I only use access and sql 2000 data sources and the occasional text
file. (Dont ask)
So, after this long ramble, does the standard version look like the right
version? I can get the Enterprise but I would hate to spend the money with
out good reason.
Phillip B.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

