I would certainly be interested in hearing why the CFMX 6.1 CFHTTP tag does not meet your needs.
--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development
-----Original Message-----
From: Ketan Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 7:55 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Need better CFX tag instead of CFHTTP tag.
Hi,
I am on CF5.0 but soon will be moving to CFMX. Regarding the COM object is
there anysite I cna find more on that.
Ketan Patel
G3 Technology Group, LLC
Graphics III Advertising, Inc.
(410)789-7007 or (800)783-1799
"It's Not Creative if it doesn't Sell."
http://www.g3group.com <http://www.g3group.com> <http://www.g3group.com <http://www.g3group.com%3e> >
-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 7:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Need better CFX tag instead of CFHTTP tag.
> I am looaking for a good CFX tag which resolves URL redirects and all.
I
> need CFX http tag which resolves url redirects at server level means
IIS
> redirects and all. Also returns me header information with the page
content.
> Eg: www.compaq.com which redirects to new hp site.
> Please suggest me a good CFX tag which will help me. I tird using
cfx_http
> but its not giving me what I want.
Which version of CF are you running? CFMX has a lot better CFHTTP
control than CF5 or less
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
