======================================
Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway!
For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
Featuring Win2003 Enterprise, RedHat Linux, CFMX 6.1 and all databases.
ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772
Suggested corporate Anti-virus policy: http://www.dshield.org/antivirus.pdf
======================================
If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done!
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?
| Actually Win 2003 is IIS 5.2 and XP is IIS 6.x
|
| Don't ask me why. I just happen to have a Win 2003 server right here and a
| cfdump reveals IIS 5.2 :-)
|
| Also... as far as Win2003 is concerned. I've had CFMX 6.1 running on
| Win2003 for a couple months now and couldn't be happier.
|
| -Novak
|
| ----- Original Message -----
| From: "Doug White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 2:19 AM
| Subject: Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?
|
|
| > You are incorrect.
| > Win2k supports IIS 5.0 and Win 2003 is IIS 6.0
| >
| > There are patched vulnerabilities in IIS 5.0 which are not needed in
| Win2003 as
| > the release is a redesign.
| > For instance the ISAPI filter URLScan is not needed on Win 2003.
| >
| > This is not to say that one should not keep up with patches as they are
| made
| > available.
| >
| > CFMX 6.1 install on Win2003 is straight forward and relatively easy when
| > compared to the CFMX 6.0 install on Win2k and appears to be more stable.
| >
| > IIS6.0 is faster than IIS 5.0
| >
| >
| > ======================================
| > Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway!
| > For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
| > Featuring Win2003 Enterprise, RedHat Linux, CFMX 6.1 and all databases.
| > ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772
| > Suggested corporate Anti-virus policy:
| http://www.dshield.org/antivirus.pdf
| > ======================================
| > If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done!
| >
| > ----- Original Message -----
| > From: "Peter Tilbrook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:45 AM
| > Subject: RE: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?
| >
| >
| > | That is total crap as Win2003 is based on WinXP code which was based on
| > | Win2K code and as such shares many of the same vulnerabilities.
| > |
| > | Do not consider installing Win2003 to be as "safe" as an unpatched Win2K
| > | installation.
| > |
| > | -----Original Message-----
| > | From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > | Sent: Thursday, 2 October 2003 6:35 PM
| > | To: CF-Talk
| > | Subject: Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?
| > |
| > |
| > | As one who is running servers in both configurations, I strongly
| recommend
| > | the
| > | Win 2003 server.
| > | First, it does not have the vulnerabilities that are found in Win2k, and
| do
| > | not
| > | require patching anywhere near as often.
| > | Second, Most services are default to OFF, which requires a little more
| > | attention
| > | to configuration, but it is easier to leave unused or unneeded services
| > | turned
| > | off.
| > | Third, the interface is XP like and requires less technical expertise to
| set
| > | up
| > | and maintain,
| > |
| > | ======================================
| > | Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway!
| > | For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
| > | Featuring Win2003 Enterprise, RedHat Linux, CFMX 6.1 and all databases.
| > | ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772
| > | Suggested corporate Anti-virus policy:
| http://www.dshield.org/antivirus.pdf
| > | ======================================
| > | If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done!
| > |
| > | ----- Original Message -----
| > | From: "Ryan Sabir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > | To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > | Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:00 AM
| > | Subject: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?
| > |
| > |
| > | | Hi all,
| > | |
| > | | I'm looking at setting up a new CFMX installation and have been given
| > | | the option of Windows 2000 Server , or 2003 Server.
| > | |
| > | | Which would be the safer option?
| > | |
| > | | Not had having a great deal of experience with 2003 I was going to say
| > | | 2000, but are there any significant advantages of 2003?
| > | |
| > | | thanks, bye!
| > | |
| > | | -----------------------
| > | | Ryan Sabir
| > | | Newgency Pty Ltd
| > | | 2a Broughton St
| > | | Paddington 2021
| > | | Sydney, Australia
| > | | Ph (02) 9331 2133
| > | | Fax (02) 9331 5199
| > | | Mobile: 0411 512 454
| > | | http://www.newgency.com/index.cfm?referer=rysig
| > | |
| > | |
| > |
| > |
| > |
|
|
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
