6.1 and a separate box dedicated to the SQL2k server. It is working great.
Of course, I also have servers running Wn2k, and RedHat Linux - All of them
support CFMX 6.1 It is for the customer to choose which platform they prefer.
As a side note, since I am running several O/S side by side, the Win2003
Enterprise seems to have the most rock solid performance, and requires the least
attention form the Teckkies.
In fact I am hosting the Victoria User group: http://www.muvclub.asn.au Seems
to be less hops from Victoria to Texas, than there is from Victoria to Sydney!
Go figure.
======================================
Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway!
For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
Featuring Win2003 Enterprise, RedHat Linux, CFMX 6.1 and all databases.
ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772
Suggested corporate Anti-virus policy: http://www.dshield.org/antivirus.pdf
======================================
If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Kear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 9:01 AM
Subject: RE: SQLServer2000 and Win2003? any issues?
| So Doug are you saying that you wouldn't recommend using Win2003 as a OS for
| CFMX either?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cheers,
|
| Michael Kear
|
| Windsor, NSW, Australia
|
| AFP Webworks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Wednesday, 8 October 2003 11:24 PM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: Re: SQLServer2000 and Win2003? any issues?
|
|
|
| The provider will need to upgrade to Win 2003 Enterprise, or as an
| alternative,
| run the SQL2k server on a separate box on Win2k.
|
| The web edition of Win2003 is not a suitable package for a provider, as it
| is
| much more suited for supporting a local single web site, or sites limited to
| static html.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
