Jim Davis
-----Original Message-----
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 7:16 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFCs and UDFs
I knew you could use CFSCRIPT bodies, but I didn't know you could use
entire
functions. Though without being able to set their access parameter,
it's
fairly insignificant. Personally, unless I need CFQUERY or HTML output,
I
write everthing in CFSCRIPT. Just much cleaner, IMHO. CFCs are about
the
only exception, because of the access control and type checking.
cheers,
barneyb
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 3:58 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFCs and UDFs
Yeah - what he said. ;^)
(I was halfway through the same message. when Ray's came in.)
Also you can have CFScript blocks inside a tag-based function - so
even
if you do need to apply security you can usually convert even complex
functions pretty easily (leave the body as script and just convert the
arguments and return basically).
Jim Davis
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
