I suppose you could "sit on" your patent for a while like eolas (lol).
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Joshua Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 2:53 PM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: RE: OT (was Re: Macromedia sinks on sales news), beat the horse dead

  No worries, I'm taking out a Patent on being an Asshole, then I'm going
  after Eolas and all these other jokers for infringement. Ask anyone I
  know, I'll get the patent.

  I wonder if one can get a patent on "Lawsuit as Business Model". Then we
  could really stick it to some people.

  On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 15:38, Kevin Marino wrote:
  > Matt,
  >
  >
  > Agree. as developers purely technical situations as this are a
  > nuisance for
  > sure, but the patents you need to be outraged about center on business
  > methods. Its these patents that make it almost impossible to say for
  > example, build an ecommerce site.  I can pretty much bet anybody on
  > this
  > list who has built an ecommerce site has for most intents and purposes
  > probably infringed on a patent.
  >
  >
  > So instead of being outraged because you have to add a few lines of
  > code to
  > work around a patent to make your project accessible to the majority
  > of your
  > customer base, you should take up the grievance with the patent office
  > and
  > government when they allow business method patents and other far more
  > damaging patents.
  >
  >
  > That's my 2 cents, hope this thread ends soon (filling my mail box up,
  > gonna
  > have to start a new folder for this thread alone  hehe )
  >
  >
  >
  > -Kevin Marino
  > ----------------------
  > Webmaster - HealthObjects
  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > 410 895 0377  
  >
  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 3:17 PM
  > To: CF-Talk
  > Subject: Re: OT (was Re: Macromedia sinks on sales news)
  >
  > > But Eolas is still only suing MS and that is precisely my issue with
  > > him. I don't think he has any intentions of suing Apple and AOL.
  > Which
  > > in my book are still pretty big fish. They have openly said they are
  > > trying to 'balance the internet browser war'. (ie. We're only going
  > to
  > > sue MS)
  > >
  > I don't know how many times I have to repeat myself. It is standard
  > practice to sue the biggest fish first and then to handle the rest
  > after that case is finished. This a legal strategy used in all
  > industries. Further, this strategy has the additional business benefit
  > of reducing overall legal expenses as the other companies will
  > generally settle if the first lawsuit is won. Eolas's decision to
  > pursue only Microsoft at this point is common and expected behavior.
  >
  > All of the reasons people keeping pointing out that make Eolas a bad
  > company in their eyes can be applied to most of the top companies in
  > existence. IMHO, web developers only seem to care about this
  > particular
  > patent issue because it affects them directly. Where is the outcry for
  > all the other stupid patents and the companies behind them?
  >
  > Matt Liotta
  > President & CEO
  > Montara Software, Inc.
  > http://www.MontaraSoftware.com
  > (888) 408-0900 x901
  >
  >   _____  
  >
  >
  >

[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to