the first nor the last that we see in CFMX. Well, then again someone migh
say that this is the desired behaviour and anything else would be a bug.
TK
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 12:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Query-past protection?
If its a feature rather than an oversight then it should be clearly notes.
I
expected an error and when I didn't get it, I was concerned. Don't get me
wrong, it's nice but it worries me when an expected error based on code
logic does not exist.
If it is a feature, I wonder how many other 'anti-error' features have
been
included.
> Michael,
>
>
>
> I think this is an "improvement" in CFMX. I know in CF 5 if you try to
> access a query element that does not exist, you would get an error.
> But, in CFMX it seems to gracefully handle this.
>
>
>
> Can anyone confirm this?
>
>
>
> MB
>
>
>
> Mark W. Breneman
> -Cold Fusion Developer
> -Network Administrator
> Vivid Media
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.vividmedia.com
> 608.270.9770
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 11:13 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Query-past protection?
>
>
>
> OK, here's a strange one that I need others to test out. Run a query,
> then
> try to access an element past the amount in the query.
> <CFQUERY name="queryname">
> select top 1 columnname from table
> </CFQUERY>
> <CFOUTPUT>#queryname.columnname[1000]#</CFOUTPUT>
> What should happen is an error message saying your trying to access a
> query
> element outside the range of the query results. What I'm getting is a
> blank
> value. If others get the same thing then it's an interesting 'feature'
> that
> should be noted, despite it being technically wrong.
>
>
>
> _____
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
